On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:18 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > > This patch fixes a bunch of sparse warnings in the newly added arm_mhuv2 > driver. > > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:506:24: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 > (different address spaces) > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:506:24: expected void const volatile [noderef] > __iomem *addr > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:506:24: got unsigned int [usertype] * > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:547:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 > (different address spaces) > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:547:42: expected unsigned int [usertype] *reg > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:547:42: got unsigned int [noderef] __iomem * > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:625:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 > (different address spaces) > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:625:42: expected unsigned int [usertype] *reg > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:625:42: got unsigned int [noderef] __iomem * > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:972:24: warning: dereference of noderef expression > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:973:22: warning: dereference of noderef expression > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:993:25: warning: dereference of noderef expression > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:1026:24: warning: dereference of noderef > expression > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:1027:22: warning: dereference of noderef > expression > drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:1048:17: warning: dereference of noderef > expression > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> > --- > Hi, > > This should have been merged to 5.11-rc since the driver got introduced > in 5.11-rc1 itself. I don't see it queued for linux-next as well. It was > posted over 6 weeks back and no response is received yet: > Yup any bug fix should be sent in rc. But this, imo, lies on the boundary of code and cosmetic issues, so I practiced discretion to keep it for the next pull request lest I won't have much to send ;)
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/db5dd593cfd8b428ce44c1cce7484d887fa5e67c.1609303304.git.viresh.ku...@linaro.org/ > > Would be good if this can still go in 5.11. > Of course it will. thanks.