On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:58:59PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > The basic objective here was to add support for "nohz_full=8-N" and/or > "rcu_nocbs="4-N" -- essentially introduce "N" as a portable reference > to the last core, evaluated at boot for anything using a CPU list.
I thought we kinda agreed that N is confusing and L is better. N to me is equal to 32 on 32 core system as *number of cores / CPUs*. While L sounds better as *last available CPU number*. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko