On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > > If you can figure out a way to disable the warning in device_del() for 
> > > just the one device being unregistered by 
> > > device_pm_destroy_suspended(),
> > 
> > Something like this, perhaps:
> > 
> > @@ -905,6 +915,18 @@ void device_del(struct device * dev)
> >     struct device * parent = dev->parent;
> >     struct class_interface *class_intf;
> >  
> > +   if (down_trylock(&dev->sem)) {
> > +           if (pm_sleep_lock()) {
> > +                   dev_warn(dev, "Illegal %s during suspend\n",
> > +                           __FUNCTION__);
> > +                   dump_stack();
> > +           } else {
> > +                   pm_sleep_unlock();
> > +           }
> > +   } else {
> > +           up(&dev->sem);
> > +   }
> > +
> >     if (parent)
> >             klist_del(&dev->knode_parent);
> >     if (MAJOR(dev->devt))
> 
> Bizarre, but it should work.

OK

Still, shouldn't we fail the removal of the device apart from giving the
warning?

> Be sure to include plenty of explanatory comments

I will.

I think that code can be moved to its own function in
drivers/base/power/main.c, btw.

> -- otherwise nobody will be able to figure it out!  :-) 

Well, I guess so. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to