On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:59:04AM +0000, Timon Baetz wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 17:29:31 +0000, Timon Baetz wrote:
> > The regulator is used for charging control by max8997_charger driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Timon Baetz <timon.ba...@protonmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts
> > index 304a8ee2364c..dad950daafb4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts
> > @@ -384,6 +384,8 @@ pmic@66 {
> > pinctrl-0 = <&max8997_irq>, <&otg_gp>, <&usb_sel>;
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> >
> > + charger-supply = <&charger_reg>;
> > +
> > regulators {
> > vadc_reg: LDO1 {
> > regulator-name = "VADC_3.3V_C210";
>
> Now that the bindings have been accepted and integrated into linux-next,
> is anything else blocking this?
No, patch is fine. It's just too late in the cycle, so I'll take the
patch after merge window.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
