Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >>> i had the patch below for v2, it's still needed (because i didnt >>> apply the s390/etc. bits), right? >> Well the patch really should go through mm because it is a change that >> covers multiple arches. I think testing with this is fine. I think >> Mike has diffed this against Linus tree so this works but will now >> conflict with the modcopy patch already in mm. > > well we cannot really ack it for x86 inclusion without having tested it > through, so it will stay in x86.git for some time. That approach found a > few problems with v1 already. In any case, v3 is looking pretty good so > far - and it's cool stuff - i'm all for unifying/generalizing arch code. > > Ingo
Hi Ingo, You probably will want to pick up V4 though I didn't add that ifndef patch you mentioned earlier. There are no functional changes, basically only a rebasing on the correct mm version. Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
