I like this patch set thank you.
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:59:44 -0500
Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/mm/memcontrol.c 2008-01-07 11:55:09.000000000
> -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c 2008-01-07 17:32:53.000000000
> -0500
<snip>
> -enum mem_cgroup_zstat_index {
> - MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT_ACTIVE,
> - MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT_INACTIVE,
> -
> - NR_MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT,
> -};
> -
> struct mem_cgroup_per_zone {
> /*
> * spin_lock to protect the per cgroup LRU
> */
> spinlock_t lru_lock;
> - struct list_head active_list;
> - struct list_head inactive_list;
> - unsigned long count[NR_MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT];
> + struct list_head lists[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> + unsigned long count[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> };
> /* Macro for accessing counter */
> #define MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, idx) ((mz)->count[(idx)])
> @@ -160,6 +152,7 @@ struct page_cgroup {
> };
> #define PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_CACHE (0x1) /* charged as cache */
> #define PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_ACTIVE (0x2) /* page is active in this
> cgroup */
> +#define PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_FILE (0x4) /* page is file system backed */
>
Now, we don't have control_type and a feature for accounting only CACHE.
Balbir-san, do you have some new plan ?
BTW, is it better to use PageSwapBacked(pc->page) rather than adding a new flag
PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_FILE ?
PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_ACTIVE is used because global reclaim can change
ACTIVE/INACTIVE attribute without accessing memory cgroup.
(Then, we cannot trust PageActive(pc->page))
ANON <-> FILE attribute can be changed dinamically (after added to LRU) ?
If no, using page_file_cache(pc->page) will be easy.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
