* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-09 13:41:32]:

> I like this patch set thank you.
> 
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:59:44 -0500
> Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Index: linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/mm/memcontrol.c       2008-01-07 
> > 11:55:09.000000000 -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c    2008-01-07 17:32:53.000000000 
> > -0500
> <snip>
> 
> > -enum mem_cgroup_zstat_index {
> > -   MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT_ACTIVE,
> > -   MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT_INACTIVE,
> > -
> > -   NR_MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT,
> > -};
> > -
> >  struct mem_cgroup_per_zone {
> >     /*
> >      * spin_lock to protect the per cgroup LRU
> >      */
> >     spinlock_t              lru_lock;
> > -   struct list_head        active_list;
> > -   struct list_head        inactive_list;
> > -   unsigned long count[NR_MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT];
> > +   struct list_head        lists[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> > +   unsigned long           count[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> >  };
> >  /* Macro for accessing counter */
> >  #define MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, idx)  ((mz)->count[(idx)])
> > @@ -160,6 +152,7 @@ struct page_cgroup {
> >  };
> >  #define PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_CACHE     (0x1)   /* charged as cache */
> >  #define PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_ACTIVE (0x2)      /* page is active in this 
> > cgroup */
> > +#define PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_FILE      (0x4)   /* page is file system backed */
> > 
> 
> Now, we don't have control_type and a feature for accounting only CACHE.
> Balbir-san, do you have some new plan ?
>

Hi, KAMEZAWA-San,

The control_type feature is gone. We still have cached page
accounting, but we do not allow control of only RSS pages anymore. We
need to control both RSS+cached pages. I do not understand your
question about new plan? Is it about adding back control_type?

 
> BTW, is it better to use PageSwapBacked(pc->page) rather than adding a new 
> flag
> PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_FILE ?
> 
> 
> PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_ACTIVE is used because global reclaim can change
> ACTIVE/INACTIVE attribute without accessing memory cgroup.
> (Then, we cannot trust PageActive(pc->page))
> 

Yes, correct. A page active on the node's zone LRU need not be active
in the memory cgroup.

> ANON <-> FILE attribute can be changed dinamically (after added to LRU) ?
> 
> If no, using page_file_cache(pc->page) will be easy.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Kame
> 

-- 
        Warm Regards,
        Balbir Singh
        Linux Technology Center
        IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to