On 03/02, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>
> > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void syscall_rollback(struct task_struct
> > *task,
> > static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task,
> > struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > - return regs->r10 == -1 ? regs->r8:0;
> > + return regs->r10 == -1 ? -regs->r8:0;
> > }
> >
> > static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
> > --
> > 2.30.1
> >
>
> Andrew, would it be fine to pass it through misc tree?
> Or should it go through Oleg as it's mostly about ptrace?
We usually route ptrace fixes via mm tree.
But this fix and another patch from you "ia64: fix
ia64_syscall_get_set_arguments()
for break-based syscalls" look very much ia64 specific. I don't think it's
actually
about ptrace, and I didn't even try to review these patches because I do not
understand this low level ia64 code.
Can it be routed via ia64 tree? Add Tony and Fenghua...
Oleg.
