On 10/03/21 01:30, Sean Christopherson wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c index 50ef757c5586..f0c99fa04ef2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c @@ -323,7 +323,18 @@ static void handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *pt, cpu_relax(); } } else { + /* + * If the SPTE is not MMU-present, there is no backing + * page associated with the SPTE and so no side effects + * that need to be recorded, and exclusive ownership of + * mmu_lock ensures the SPTE can't be made present. + * Note, zapping MMIO SPTEs is also unnecessary as they + * are guarded by the memslots generation, not by being + * unreachable. + */ old_child_spte = READ_ONCE(*sptep); + if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_child_spte)) + continue;/** Marking the SPTE as a removed SPTE is not
Ben, do you plan to make this path take mmu_lock for read? If so, this wouldn't be too useful IIUC.
Paolo

