On Mon 2008-01-14 00:29:12, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:17:21AM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Tue 2008-01-08 11:57:03, Russell King wrote:
> > > + if (!tries)
> > > + printk(KERN_ERR "%s%s%s%d: Unable to drain
> > > transmitter\n",
> > > + port->dev ? port->dev->bus_id : "",
> > > + port->dev ? ": " : "",
> > > + drv->dev_name, port->line);
> > >
> > > ops->shutdown(port);
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Is printk() enough for 'we've just lost your data' condition? Maybe we
> > should abort suspend if we can't drain fifo?
>
> That would mean that a port set for hardware flow control, with hardware
> implemented flow control, has CTS deasserted, you'll never suspend.
Yep.
> If you're suspending because your battery is almost dead what would you
> prefer - the system being prevented from suspending and losing complete
> power unexpectedly, resulting in complete data loss, or losing the
> characters in the serial port and suspending?
>
> Which is the lesser of two evils?
Not sure, but there's third option -- correct but more work. What
about saving/restoring fifo state? That will not stall suspend, nor
will loose data.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
