From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@nvidia.com>

[ Upstream commit dc860b88ce0a7ed9a048d5042cbb175daf60b657 ]

Routes are currently processed from a workqueue whereas nexthop objects
are processed in system call context. This can result in the driver not
finding a suitable nexthop group for a route and issuing a warning [1].

Fix this by ignoring such routes earlier in the process. The subsequent
deletion notification will be ignored as well.

[1]
 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 7754 at 
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c:4853 
mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event_work+0x1112/0x1e00 [mlxsw_spectrum]
 [...]
 CPU: 2 PID: 7754 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 5.11.0-rc6-cq-20210207-1 #16
 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100/SA001390, BIOS 5.6.5 
05/24/2018
 Workqueue: mlxsw_core_ordered mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event_work [mlxsw_spectrum]
 RIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event_work+0x1112/0x1e00 [mlxsw_spectrum]

Fixes: cdd6cfc54c64 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Allow programming routes with 
nexthop objects")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Alex Veber <ale...@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alex Veber <ale...@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <pe...@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
index 41424ee909a0..23d9fe18adba 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -5861,6 +5861,10 @@ mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
        if (mlxsw_sp->router->aborted)
                return 0;
 
+       if (fen_info->fi->nh &&
+           !mlxsw_sp_nexthop_obj_group_lookup(mlxsw_sp, fen_info->fi->nh->id))
+               return 0;
+
        fib_node = mlxsw_sp_fib_node_get(mlxsw_sp, fen_info->tb_id,
                                         &fen_info->dst, sizeof(fen_info->dst),
                                         fen_info->dst_len,
@@ -6511,6 +6515,9 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_replace(struct mlxsw_sp 
*mlxsw_sp,
        if (mlxsw_sp_fib6_rt_should_ignore(rt))
                return 0;
 
+       if (rt->nh && !mlxsw_sp_nexthop_obj_group_lookup(mlxsw_sp, rt->nh->id))
+               return 0;
+
        fib_node = mlxsw_sp_fib_node_get(mlxsw_sp, rt->fib6_table->tb6_id,
                                         &rt->fib6_dst.addr,
                                         sizeof(rt->fib6_dst.addr),
-- 
2.30.1



Reply via email to