In tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched there is a call to tdp_iter_start which
causes the iterator to continue its walk over the paging structure from
the root. This is needed after a yield as paging structure could have
been freed in the interim.

The tdp_iter_start call is not very clear and something of a hack. It
requires exposing tdp_iter fields not used elsewhere in tdp_mmu.c and
the effect is not obvious from the function name. Factor a more aptly
named function out of tdp_iter_start and call it from
tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched and tdp_iter_start.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgar...@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c  |  4 +---
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
index e5f148106e20..f7f94ea65243 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
@@ -20,6 +20,21 @@ static gfn_t round_gfn_for_level(gfn_t gfn, int level)
        return gfn & -KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Return the TDP iterator to the root PT and allow it to continue its
+ * traversal over the paging structure from there.
+ */
+void tdp_iter_restart(struct tdp_iter *iter)
+{
+       iter->yielded_gfn = iter->next_last_level_gfn;
+       iter->level = iter->root_level;
+
+       iter->gfn = round_gfn_for_level(iter->next_last_level_gfn, iter->level);
+       tdp_iter_refresh_sptep(iter);
+
+       iter->valid = true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Sets a TDP iterator to walk a pre-order traversal of the paging structure
  * rooted at root_pt, starting with the walk to translate next_last_level_gfn.
@@ -31,16 +46,11 @@ void tdp_iter_start(struct tdp_iter *iter, u64 *root_pt, 
int root_level,
        WARN_ON(root_level > PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL);
 
        iter->next_last_level_gfn = next_last_level_gfn;
-       iter->yielded_gfn = iter->next_last_level_gfn;
        iter->root_level = root_level;
        iter->min_level = min_level;
-       iter->level = root_level;
-       iter->pt_path[iter->level - 1] = (tdp_ptep_t)root_pt;
+       iter->pt_path[iter->root_level - 1] = (tdp_ptep_t)root_pt;
 
-       iter->gfn = round_gfn_for_level(iter->next_last_level_gfn, iter->level);
-       tdp_iter_refresh_sptep(iter);
-
-       iter->valid = true;
+       tdp_iter_restart(iter);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
index 4cc177d75c4a..8eb424d17c91 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
@@ -63,5 +63,6 @@ void tdp_iter_start(struct tdp_iter *iter, u64 *root_pt, int 
root_level,
                    int min_level, gfn_t next_last_level_gfn);
 void tdp_iter_next(struct tdp_iter *iter);
 tdp_ptep_t tdp_iter_root_pt(struct tdp_iter *iter);
+void tdp_iter_restart(struct tdp_iter *iter);
 
 #endif /* __KVM_X86_MMU_TDP_ITER_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 946da74e069c..38b6b6936171 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -664,9 +664,7 @@ static inline bool tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm 
*kvm,
 
                WARN_ON(iter->gfn > iter->next_last_level_gfn);
 
-               tdp_iter_start(iter, iter->pt_path[iter->root_level - 1],
-                              iter->root_level, iter->min_level,
-                              iter->next_last_level_gfn);
+               tdp_iter_restart(iter);
 
                return true;
        }
-- 
2.31.0.rc2.261.g7f71774620-goog

Reply via email to