Hi Bhaskar,
Thank you very much for catching this typo.
My feedback [1] to a previous patch from you applies here also. The
prefix should be "x86/resctrl:" for contributions to this area.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7e3a5c13-db5c-7399-2b80-f1284786e...@intel.com/
On 3/17/2021 1:40 AM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
s/derefence/dereference/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhas...@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
index e916646adc69..43990a882b36 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
@@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ int rdtgroup_pseudo_lock_create(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
* If the thread does not get on the CPU for whatever
* reason and the process which sets up the region is
* interrupted then this will leave the thread in runnable
- * state and once it gets on the CPU it will derefence
+ * state and once it gets on the CPU it will dereference
* the cleared, but not freed, plr struct resulting in an
* empty pseudo-locking loop.
*/
--
2.30.2
Reinette
