On 3/18/21 2:55 AM, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
Fix the following coccicheck warning:./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c:76:15-16: WARNING comparing pointer to 0. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <ab...@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.ch...@linux.alibaba.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c index 5f645fd..d4247d6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct bpf_fentry_test_t { SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test7") int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) { - if (arg == 0) + if (!arg) test7_result = 1; return 0; } @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test8") int BPF_PROG(test8, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) { - if (arg->a == 0) + if (!arg->a) test8_result = 1; return 0; }
This doesn't apply. Please rebase against bpf-next tree, and also make sure to squash any other such patches into a single one.
