GICv4.1 gives a way to get the VLPI state, which needs to map the
vPE first, and after the state read, we may remap the vPE back while
the VPT is not empty. So we can't assume that the VPT is empty at
the first map. Besides, the optimization of PTZ is probably limited
since the HW should be fairly efficient to parse the empty VPT. Let's
drop the setting of PTZ altogether.

Signed-off-by: Shenming Lu <lushenm...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 4eb907f65bd0..c8b5a88ac31c 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -794,8 +794,16 @@ static struct its_vpe *its_build_vmapp_cmd(struct its_node 
*its,
 
        its_encode_alloc(cmd, alloc);
 
-       /* We can only signal PTZ when alloc==1. Why do we have two bits? */
-       its_encode_ptz(cmd, alloc);
+       /*
+        * We can only signal PTZ when alloc==1. Why do we have two bits?
+        * GICv4.1 gives a way to get the VLPI state, which needs the vPE
+        * to be unmapped first, and in this case, we may remap the vPE
+        * back while the VPT is not empty. So we can't assume that the
+        * VPT is empty at the first map. Besides, the optimization of PTZ
+        * is probably limited since the HW should be fairly efficient to
+        * parse the empty VPT. Let's drop the setting of PTZ altogether.
+        */
+       its_encode_ptz(cmd, false);
        its_encode_vconf_addr(cmd, vconf_addr);
        its_encode_vmapp_default_db(cmd, desc->its_vmapp_cmd.vpe->vpe_db_lpi);
 
-- 
2.19.1

Reply via email to