On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:13:40PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> +#define RESPONSE_BUF(w) ((void *)(w)->response_buf)
> +#define REQUEST_BUF(w) ((void *)(w)->request_buf)
Why do you do this obfuscation?
> +#define RESPONSE_BUF_NEXT(w) \
> + ((void *)((w)->response_buf + (w)->next_smb2_rsp_hdr_off))
> +#define REQUEST_BUF_NEXT(w) \
> + ((void *)((w)->request_buf + (w)->next_smb2_rcv_hdr_off))
These obfuscations aren't even used; delete them
> +#define RESPONSE_SZ(w) ((w)->response_sz)
> +
> +#define INIT_AUX_PAYLOAD(w) ((w)->aux_payload_buf = NULL)
> +#define HAS_AUX_PAYLOAD(w) ((w)->aux_payload_sz != 0)
I mean, do you really find it clearer to write:
if (HAS_AUX_PAYLOAD(work))
than
if (work->aux_payload_sz)
The unobfuscated version is actually shorter!
