Hi, On 3/23/21 3:11 PM, Aisheng Dong wrote: >> From: Chanwoo Choi <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 12:11 PM >> >> Hi, >> >> On 3/23/21 12:25 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote: >>> Hi Chanwoo, >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:13 AM Dong Aisheng <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> A few small fixes and improvements >>>> >>>> ChangeLog: >>>> v1->v2: >>>> * squash a few patches >>>> * rebase to devfreq-testing >>> >>> I have to rebase to devfreq-testing instead of devfreq-next because >>> below two patches only exist in devfreq-testing. >>> 5cc75e9252e9 (devfreq/devfreq-testing) PM / devfreq: Add >>> devfreq_transitions debugfs file >>> dc9e557845c1 PM / devfreq: Add new up_threshold and down_differential >>> sysfs attrs My patch 5 needs change based on it according to your >>> suggestion. So i have to rebase to that branch. >>> >>> However, i found devfreq-testing can't build with GOV_PASSVIE enabled. >>> Patch 1 fixed it. You can squash to the original one when apply. >>> >>> Please help take a look at this new series. >> >> Please rebase your patches either devfreq-next or linux-next.git Because >> devfreq-testing branch is not official. > > Okay, then how about the patch 5 below? > [PATCH V2 5/6] PM / devfreq: governor: optimize simpleondemand get_target_freq > > Should I also rebase it to devfreq-next or drop it first and then resend when > your patch > merged into mainline?
Yes. Thanks. [snip] -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics
