On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:36:23AM +0000, John Garry wrote: > On 01/08/2020 12:40, Paul A. Clarke wrote: > > > v4 changes: > > > - removed acks from patch because it changed a bit > > > with the last fixes: > > > perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node > > > - fixed runtime metrics [Kajol Jain] > > > - increased recursion depth [Paul A. Clarke] > > > - changed patches due to dependencies: > > > perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node > > > perf metric: Add recursion check when processing nested metrics > > > perf metric: Rename struct egroup to metric > > > perf metric: Rename group_list to metric_list > > > > > > Also available in here: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git > > > perf/metric > > I built and ran from the above git branch, and things seem to work. > > Indeed, I was able to apply my changes to exploit the new capabilities > > via modifications to tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power9/metrics.json, > > as I posted earlier (and will submit once this set gets merged).
> I was just wondering: Does perf subtest 10.3 work ok for you with the metric > reuse? > > That's "Parsing of PMU event table metrics" subtest. I confess I'm not sure what you are asking. Using the latest mainline (84196390620ac0e5070ae36af84c137c6216a7dc), perf subtest 10.3 does pass for me: -- $ ./perf test 10 10: PMU events : 10.1: PMU event table sanity : Ok 10.2: PMU event map aliases : Ok 10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics : Ok 10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs : Ok -- PC
