On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:08:08PM +0000, Zhou Ti (x2019cwm) wrote: > But I don't think it's a good idea to handle this in callers, because > logically the function shouldn't return negative values. Returning 0 directly > would allow idle governors to get another chance to select again.
Hmm, I'm going to leave the last word to Rafael since cpuidle are the only callers of this. In any case we need to fix it. Thanks.
