On 3/26/21 9:45 AM, Tom Saeger wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:41:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 3/25/21 9:04 PM, Tom Saeger wrote: >>> >>> s/Additonal/Additional/ >>> s/assocaited/associated/ >>> s/assocaited/associated/ >>> s/assocating/associating/ >>> s/becasue/because/ >>> s/configred/configured/ >>> s/deactive/deactivate/ >>> s/followings/following/ >>> s/funtion/function/ >>> s/heirarchy/hierarchy/ >>> s/intiailized/initialized/ >>> s/prefered/preferred/ >>> s/readded/read/ >>> s/Secion/Section/ >>> s/soley/solely/ >> >> While I'm generally happy to accept any patch that makes sense, the >> recent influx of speling fixes have me less than excited. They just >> add complications to backports and stable patches, for example, and >> I'd prefer not to take them for that reason alone. > > Nod. > > In that case - perhaps adding these entries to scripts/spelling.txt > would at least catch some going forward? > > I can send that.
That seems like a good idea. -- Jens Axboe
