On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 12:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:05:25PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 14:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khand...@arm.com> > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 03aaf83fba6e5af08b5dd174c72edee9b7d9ed9b ] > > > > > > This overrides arch_get_mappable_range() on arm64 platform which will be > > > used with recently added generic framework. It drops > > > inside_linear_region() and subsequent check in arch_add_memory() which are > > > no longer required. It also adds a VM_BUG_ON() check that would ensure > > > that mhp_range_allowed() has already been called. > > > > > > Link: > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1612149902-7867-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khand...@arm.com > > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khand...@arm.com> > > > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> > > > Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> > > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org> > > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> > > > Cc: Heiko Carstens <h...@linux.ibm.com> > > > Cc: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> > > > Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com> > > > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> > > > Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org> > > > Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalva...@suse.de> > > > Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gu...@cloud.ionos.com> > > > Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.li...@gmail.com> > > > Cc: teawater <teawat...@linux.alibaba.com> > > > Cc: Vasily Gorbik <g...@linux.ibm.com> > > > Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@linux.alibaba.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 15 +++++++-------- > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > > > index 6f0648777d34..92b3be127796 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > > > @@ -1443,16 +1443,19 @@ static void __remove_pgd_mapping(pgd_t *pgdir, > > > unsigned long start, u64 size) > > > free_empty_tables(start, end, PAGE_OFFSET, PAGE_END); > > > } > > > > > > -static bool inside_linear_region(u64 start, u64 size) > > > +struct range arch_get_mappable_range(void) > > > { > > > + struct range mhp_range; > > > + > > > /* > > > * Linear mapping region is the range [PAGE_OFFSET..(PAGE_END - > > > 1)] > > > * accommodating both its ends but excluding PAGE_END. Max > > > physical > > > * range which can be mapped inside this linear mapping range, > > > must > > > * also be derived from its end points. > > > */ > > > - return start >= __pa(_PAGE_OFFSET(vabits_actual)) && > > > - (start + size - 1) <= __pa(PAGE_END - 1); > > > + mhp_range.start = __pa(_PAGE_OFFSET(vabits_actual)); > > > + mhp_range.end = __pa(PAGE_END - 1); > > > + return mhp_range; > > > } > > > > > > int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, > > > @@ -1460,11 +1463,7 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, > > > { > > > int ret, flags = 0; > > > > > > - if (!inside_linear_region(start, size)) { > > > - pr_err("[%llx %llx] is outside linear mapping region\n", > > > start, start + size); > > > - return -EINVAL; > > > - } > > > - > > > + VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); > > > if (rodata_full || debug_pagealloc_enabled()) > > > flags = NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS; > > > > The stable rc 5.10 and 5.11 builds failed for arm64 architecture > > due to below warnings / errors, > > > > > Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khand...@arm.com> > > > arm64/mm: define arch_get_mappable_range() > > > > > > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: In function 'arch_add_memory': > > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:13: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'mhp_range_allowed'; did you mean 'cpu_map_prog_allowed'? > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); > > ^ > > include/linux/build_bug.h:30:63: note: in definition of macro > > 'BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID' > > #define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e)))) > > ^ > > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:2: note: in expansion of macro 'VM_BUG_ON' > > VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); > > ^~~~~~~~~ > > > > Build link, > > https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.11/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/41/consoleText > > https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.10/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=dragonboard-410c,label=docker-buster-lkft/120/consoleFull > > thanks, will go drop this, and the patch that was after it in the > series, from both trees and will push out a -rc2. >
Why were these picked up in the first place? I don't see any fixes or cc:stable tags, and the commit log clearly describes that the change is preparatory work for enabling arm64 support into a recently introduced generic framework. -- Ard.
