On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, Ben Gardon wrote:
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c     |  6 ++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 49b7097fb55b..22742619698d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -5455,6 +5455,12 @@ static void kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(struct kvm *kvm)
>       kvm_zap_obsolete_pages(kvm);
>  
>       write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> +     if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm)) {
> +             read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +             kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all_fast(kvm);

Purely because it exists first, I think we should follow the legacy MMU's
terminology, i.e. kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_obsolete_pages().

> +             read_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +     }
>  }

Reply via email to