On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 12:21 AM Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:15:20PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote: > > We already have a helper lruvec_memcg() to get the memcg from lruvec, we > > do not need to do it ourselves in the lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(). So use > > lruvec_memcg() instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuc...@bytedance.com> > > --- > > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h > > index a35a22994cf7..6e3283828391 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h > > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h > > @@ -744,20 +744,20 @@ static inline struct lruvec > > *mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(struct page *page) > > return mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat); > > } > > > > +static inline struct mem_cgroup *lruvec_memcg(struct lruvec *lruvec); > > Please reorder the functions instead to avoid forward decls.
OK. Will fix it in the next version. > > > static inline bool lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(struct page *page, > > struct lruvec *lruvec) > > { > > pg_data_t *pgdat = page_pgdat(page); > > const struct mem_cgroup *memcg; > > - struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz; > > > > if (mem_cgroup_disabled()) > > return lruvec == &pgdat->__lruvec; > > > > - mz = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec); > > memcg = page_memcg(page) ? : root_mem_cgroup; > > > > - return lruvec->pgdat == pgdat && mz->memcg == memcg; > > + return lruvec->pgdat == pgdat && lruvec_memcg(lruvec) == memcg; > > Looks reasonable to me, but I wonder if there is more we can do. > > lruvec_memcg() already handles CONFIG_MEMCG and mem_cgroup_disabled() > combinations, and there is also a lruvec_pgdat() which does. > > One thing that is odd is page_memcg(page) ? : root_mem_cgroup. How can > lruvec pages not have a page_memcg()? mem_cgroup_page_lruvec() has: You are right. page_memcg() cannot be NULL. > > memcg = page_memcg(page); > VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(!memcg && !mem_cgroup_disabled(), page); > > Unless I'm missing something, we should be able to have a single > definition for this function that works for !CONFIG_MEMCG, > CONFIG_MEMCG + mem_cgroup_disabled() and CONFIG_MEMCG: > > lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock() > { > return lruvec_pgdat(lruvec) == page_pgdat(page) && > lruvec_memcg(lruvec) == page_memcg(page); > } Aha, how wonderful! It is simpler than mine. I will use this. Thanks for your suggestions.