Hi Bharata,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.12-rc6 next-20210401]
[cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Bharata-B-Rao/High-kmalloc-32-slab-cache-consumption-with-10k-containers/20210405-135124
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 
5e46d1b78a03d52306f21f77a4e4a144b6d31486
config: s390-randconfig-r032-20210405 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 
2760a808b9916a2839513b7fd7314a464f52481e)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O 
~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        # 
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b7ba3522029771bd74c8b6324de9ce20b5a06593
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
Bharata-B-Rao/High-kmalloc-32-slab-cache-consumption-with-10k-containers/20210405-135124
        git checkout b7ba3522029771bd74c8b6324de9ce20b5a06593
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from mm/list_lru.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22:
   In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23:
   In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:36:59: note: expanded from macro 
'__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
   #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from mm/list_lru.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22:
   In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23:
   In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro 
'__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
   #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from mm/list_lru.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22:
   In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23:
   In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a 
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> mm/list_lru.c:138:49: error: no member named 'memcg_lrus' in 'struct 
>> list_lru_node'
                           memcg_lrus = 
rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
                                                                  ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:562:31: note: expanded from macro 
'rcu_dereference_protected'
           __rcu_dereference_protected((p), (c), __rcu)
                                        ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:383:12: note: expanded from macro 
'__rcu_dereference_protected'
           ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
                     ^
>> mm/list_lru.c:138:49: error: no member named 'memcg_lrus' in 'struct 
>> list_lru_node'
                           memcg_lrus = 
rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
                                                                  ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:562:31: note: expanded from macro 
'rcu_dereference_protected'
           __rcu_dereference_protected((p), (c), __rcu)
                                        ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:383:35: note: expanded from macro 
'__rcu_dereference_protected'
           ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
                                            ^
>> mm/list_lru.c:138:15: error: assigning to 'struct list_lru_memcg *' from 
>> incompatible type 'void'
                           memcg_lrus = 
rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
                                      ^ 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   12 warnings and 3 errors generated.


vim +138 mm/list_lru.c

   120  
   121  bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
   122  {
   123          int nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(item));
   124          struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
   125          struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
   126          struct list_lru_one *l;
   127          struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus;
   128  
   129          spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
   130          if (list_empty(item)) {
   131                  l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item, &memcg);
   132                  if (!l) {
   133                          l = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_lru_one), 
GFP_ATOMIC);
   134                          if (!l)
   135                                  goto out;
   136  
   137                          init_one_lru(l);
 > 138                          memcg_lrus = 
 > rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
   139                          memcg_lrus->lru[memcg_cache_id(memcg)] = l;
   140                  }
   141                  list_add_tail(item, &l->list);
   142                  /* Set shrinker bit if the first element was added */
   143                  if (!l->nr_items++)
   144                          memcg_set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid,
   145                                                 lru_shrinker_id(lru));
   146                  nlru->nr_items++;
   147                  spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
   148                  return true;
   149          }
   150  out:
   151          spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
   152          return false;
   153  }
   154  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_add);
   155  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-...@lists.01.org

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: application/gzip

Reply via email to