Quoting quanyang.w...@windriver.com (2021-04-06 08:31:31) > From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.w...@windriver.com> > > If there is a IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_MODE request sent to ATF ever, > we shouldn't skip invoking PM_CLOCK_ENABLE fn even though this > pll has been enabled. In ATF implementation, it will only assign > the mode to the variable (struct pm_pll *)pll->mode when handling > IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_MODE call. Invoking PM_CLOCK_ENABLE can force > ATF send request to PWU to set the pll mode to PLL's register. > > There is a scenario that happens in enabling VPLL_INT(clk_id:96): > 1) VPLL_INT has been enabled during booting. > 2) A driver calls clk_set_rate and according to the rate, the VPLL_INT > should be set to FRAC mode. Then zynqmp_pll_set_mode is called > to pass IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_MODE to ATF. Note that at this point > ATF just stores the mode to a variable. > 3) This driver calls clk_prepare_enable and zynqmp_pll_enable is > called to try to enable VPLL_INT pll. Because of 1), the function > zynqmp_pll_enable just returns without doing anything after checking > that this pll has been enabled. > > In the scenario above, the pll mode of VPLL_INT will never be set > successfully. So adding set_pll_mode to check condition to fix it. > > Fixes: 3fde0e16d016 ("drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver") > Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.w...@windriver.com> > Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> > ---
Applied to clk-next