On 4/1/21 9:16 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 3/31/21 10:03 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote: >> On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 17:35 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> On 3/31/21 5:27 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 3/31/21 5:03 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 17:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> You are missing to add these patches to linux-pm mailing list. >>>>>> Need to send them to linu-pm ML. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, before received this series, I tried to clean-up these patches >>>>>> on testing branch[1]. So that I add my comment with my clean-up case. >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!zIrzeDp9vPnm1_SDzVPuzqdHn3zWie9DnfBXaA-j9-CSrVc6aR9_rJQQiw81_CgAPh9XRRs$ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And 'Saravana Kannan <skan...@codeaurora.org>' is wrong email address. >>>>>> Please update the email or drop this email. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Chanwoo, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for the advices. >>>>> I will resend patch v9 (add to linux-pm ML), remove this patch, and note >>>>> that my patch set base on >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJ8WFhg_g$ >>>>> >>>> >>>> I has not yet test this patch[1] on devfreq-testing-passive-gov branch. >>>> So that if possible, I'd like you to test your patches with this patch[1] >>>> and then if there is no problem, could you send the next patches with >>>> patch[1]? >>>> >>>> [1]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/commit/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov&id=39c80d11a8f42dd63ecea1e0df595a0ceb83b454__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJR2cQqZs$ >>>> >>> >>> >>> Sorry for the confusion. I make the devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] >>> branch based on latest devfreq-next branch. >>> [1] >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJ8WFhg_g$ >>> >>> >>> First of all, if possible, I want to test them[1] with your patches in this >>> series. >>> And then if there are no any problem, please let me know. After confirmed >>> from you, >>> I'll send the patches of devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] branch. >>> How about that? >>> >> Hi Chanwoo~ >> >> We will use this on Google Chrome project. >> Google Hsin-Yi has test your patch + my patch set v8 [2~8] >> >> make sure cci devfreqs runs with cpufreq. >> suspend resume >> speedometer2 benchmark >> It is okay. >> >> Please send the patches of devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] branch. >> >> I will send patch v9 base on yours latter. > > Thanks for your test. I'll send the patches today.
I'm sorry for delay because when I tested the patches for devfreq parent type on Odroid-xu3, there are some problem related to lazy linking of OPP. So I'm trying to analyze them. Unfortunately, we need to postpone these patches to next linux version. [snip] -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics
