On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 8:50 AM Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 4/8/21 11:17 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -8490,7 +8490,8 @@ static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(struct 
> > compact_control *cc,
> >               cc->nr_migratepages -= nr_reclaimed;
> >
> >               ret = migrate_pages(&cc->migratepages, alloc_migration_target,
> > -                             NULL, (unsigned long)&mtc, cc->mode, 
> > MR_CONTIG_RANGE);
> > +                             NULL, (unsigned long)&mtc, cc->mode, 
> > MR_CONTIG_RANGE,
> > +                             NULL);
> >       }
> >       if (ret < 0) {
> >               putback_movable_pages(&cc->migratepages);
>
> I also considered passing NULL to mean "I don't care about
> nr_succeeded".  I mostly avoided it to reduce churn.  But, looking at it
> here, it does seem cleaner.
>
> Any objections to moving over to Oscar's suggestion?

No, fine to me.

Reply via email to