On (23/01/08 12:15), Andi Kleen didst pronounce: > > Anyways from your earlier comments it sounds like you're trying to add SRAT > parsing to CONFIG_NUMAQ. Since that's redundant with the old implementation > it doesn't sound like a very useful thing to do. >
No, that would not be useful at all as it's redundant as you point out. The only reason to add it is if the Opteron box can figure out the CPU-to-node affinity. Right now everything gets dumped into node 0 where as x86_64 can figure it out properly. > But the patch is applied already i think. Well I'm sure it passed > checkpatch.pl at least. > :| The patches applied so far are about increasing test coverage, not SRAT messing. While there are still breakages for some boxen, more configurations should work on more machines than previously. Those using non-NUMA .configs should not notice the difference. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
