On Wednesday 23 January 2008 12:24:36 Mel Gorman wrote: > On (23/01/08 12:15), Andi Kleen didst pronounce: > > Anyways from your earlier comments it sounds like you're trying to add > > SRAT parsing to CONFIG_NUMAQ. Since that's redundant with the old > > implementation it doesn't sound like a very useful thing to do. > > No, that would not be useful at all as it's redundant as you point out. The > only reason to add it is if the Opteron box can figure out the CPU-to-node > affinity.
Assuming srat_32.c was fixed to not crash on Opteron it would likely do that already without further changes. > :| The patches applied so far are about increasing test coverage, not SRAT > messing. Test coverage of the NUMAQ kernel? If you wanted to increase test coverage of 32bit NUMA kernels the right strategy would be to fix srat_32. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/