Adrian Bunk wrote: > But Linux kernel development is not driven by people producing hot air > about what they wish to see in the future, Linux kernel development is > driven by people sending patches.
Removal of code is not development. It's the opposite of development. At one stage iBCS2 support DID work. Now it doesn't. Now there's an argument that the remaining infrastructure should be removed. This is the wrong direction to take. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
