On Fri 2008-01-25 04:25:24, David Newall wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Removing dead code makes:
> > - the kernel smaller,
> > - the kernel faster and
> > - makes it easier to maintain the non-dead code.
> >
>
> The performance benefit is trivial, and the improvement to
> maintainability is even less.
>
> > All of these are considered useful by the people who actually
> > contribute to the Linux kernel.
> >
>
> Contributions to the kernel take forms other than just code. I'm
> contributing in this very instance by putting the argument against
> removal of code. Once removed it'll be much harder to re-insert than to
> repair in-situ.
/-------------------------\
| |
| Stop feeding the TROLL |
| |
\-------------------------/
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
(yes, that's you, David. You are
wasting everyone's time. Go away.)
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
