On Fri, 16 Apr 2021, Joe Perches wrote: > > I'm not sure if that complex message > > routing via `blogic_msg' is worth having even, rather than calling > > `printk' or suitable variants directly. > > It's to allow the message content to be added to the internal > &adapter->msgbuf[adapter->msgbuflen] > with strcpy for later use with blogic_show_info()/seq_write.
I know, but it's not clear to me if it's worth it (a potential buffer overrun there too, BTW). Maciej
