On 2024/1/24 9:32, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:21:39 +0800
Ye Bin <yebi...@huawei.com> wrote:

This patch adds test cases for new print format type "%pd/%pD".The test cases
test the following items:
1. Test README if add "%pd/%pD" type;
2. Test "%pd" type for dput();
3. Test "%pD" type for vfs_read();

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebi...@huawei.com>
---
  .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_args_vfs.tc   | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 
tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_args_vfs.tc

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_args_vfs.tc 
b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_args_vfs.tc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1d8edd294dd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_args_vfs.tc
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# description: Kprobe event VFS type argument
+# requires: kprobe_events
+
+case `uname -m` in
+x86_64)
+  ARG1=%di
+;;
+i[3456]86)
+  ARG1=%ax
+;;
+aarch64)
+  ARG1=%x0
+;;
+arm*)
+  ARG1=%r0
+;;
+ppc64*)
+  ARG1=%r3
+;;
+ppc*)
+  ARG1=%r3
You can merge this ppc* and ppc64* cases :)

+;;
+s390*)
+  ARG1=%r2
+;;
+mips*)
+  ARG1=%r4
+;;
+loongarch*)
+  ARG1=%r4
+;;
+riscv*)
+  ARG1=%a0
Anyway, I wonder why don't you use '$arg1' instead of these registers.
Is there any reason?

Thank you,
Thank you for your advice.
Actually, I wrote the test case by referring to " kprobe_args_string.tc". I'll modify it
according to your suggestion.

+;;
+*)
+  echo "Please implement other architecture here"
+  exit_untested
+esac
+
+: "Test argument %pd/%pD in README"
+grep -q "%pd/%pD" README
+
+: "Test argument %pd with name"
+echo "p:testprobe dput name=${ARG1}:%pd" > kprobe_events
+echo 1 > events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+grep -q "1" events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+echo 0 > events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+grep "dput" trace | grep -q "enable"
+echo "" > kprobe_events
+echo "" > trace
+
+: "Test argument %pd without name"
+echo "p:testprobe dput ${ARG1}:%pd" > kprobe_events
+echo 1 > events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+grep -q "1" events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+echo 0 > events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+grep "dput" trace | grep -q "enable"
+echo "" > kprobe_events
+echo "" > trace
+
+: "Test argument %pD with name"
+echo "p:testprobe vfs_read name=${ARG1}:%pD" > kprobe_events
+echo 1 > events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+grep -q "1" events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+echo 0 > events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+grep "vfs_read" trace | grep -q "enable"
+echo "" > kprobe_events
+echo "" > trace
+
+: "Test argument %pD without name"
+echo "p:testprobe vfs_read ${ARG1}:%pD" > kprobe_events
+echo 1 > events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+grep -q "1"  events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+echo 0 > events/kprobes/testprobe/enable
+grep "vfs_read" trace | grep -q "enable"
+echo "" > kprobe_events
+echo "" > trace
--
2.31.1




Reply via email to