On Mittwoch, 24. April 2024 18:23:53 MESZ Luca Weiss wrote:
> The first patch is for removing a bogus error warning I've noticed while
> developing this on msm8226 - there the patches are also coming later for
> this SoC since apcs is getting hooked up to cpufreq there also.
> 
> Apart from usages from the qcom,smsm driver (patches coming!) all other
> usages of the apcs mailbox now go via the mailbox driver - where one is
> used, so some arm32 boards will continue using "qcom,ipc*" properties in
> the short or long term.
> 
> Only compile-tested apart from msm8953 (tested on sdm632-fairphone-fp3)
> and msm8974 (tested on msm8974pro-fairphone-fp2), but I don't expect any
> complications with this.

I think I forgot to mention this, but the msm8974 patch depends on
this series:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240408-msm8974-apcs-v1-0-90cb73688...@z3ntu.xyz/

> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <l...@z3ntu.xyz>
> ---
> Luca Weiss (7):
>       rpmsg: qcom_smd: Don't print error during probe deferral
>       ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974: Use mboxes properties for APCS
>       arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Use mboxes properties for APCS
>       arm64: dts: qcom: msm8939: Use mboxes properties for APCS
>       arm64: dts: qcom: msm8953: Use mboxes properties for APCS
>       arm64: dts: qcom: msm8976: Use mboxes properties for APCS
>       arm64: dts: qcom: msm8994: Use mboxes properties for APCS
> 
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 14 +++++++-------
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi    | 10 +++++-----
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8939.dtsi    |  4 ++--
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953.dtsi    | 10 +++++-----
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8976.dtsi    |  8 ++++----
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994.dtsi    |  6 +++---
>  drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c                 |  3 ++-
>  7 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 43173e6dbaa227f3107310d4df4a3bacd5e0df33
> change-id: 20240423-apcs-mboxes-12ee6c01a5b3
> 
> Best regards,
> 





Reply via email to