Hi Paolo, On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:07:44AM +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > Fix trailing statements should be on next line
> -if ( partial_status & SW_C3 ) printk("SW: condition bit 3\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_C2 ) printk("SW: condition bit 2\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_C1 ) printk("SW: condition bit 1\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_C0 ) printk("SW: condition bit 0\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_Summary ) printk("SW: exception summary\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_Stack_Fault ) printk("SW: stack fault\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_Precision ) printk("SW: loss of precision\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_Underflow ) printk("SW: underflow\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_Overflow ) printk("SW: overflow\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_Zero_Div ) printk("SW: divide by zero\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_Denorm_Op ) printk("SW: denormalized operand\n"); > -if ( partial_status & SW_Invalid ) printk("SW: invalid operation\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_Backward ) > +printk("SW: backward compatibility\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_C3 ) > +printk("SW: condition bit 3\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_C2 ) > +printk("SW: condition bit 2\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_C1 ) > +printk("SW: condition bit 1\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_C0 ) > +printk("SW: condition bit 0\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_Summary ) > +printk("SW: exception summary\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_Stack_Fault ) > +printk("SW: stack fault\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_Precision ) > +printk("SW: loss of precision\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_Underflow ) > +printk("SW: underflow\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_Overflow ) > +printk("SW: overflow\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_Zero_Div ) > +printk("SW: divide by zero\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_Denorm_Op ) > +printk("SW: denormalized operand\n"); > +if ( partial_status & SW_Invalid ) > +printk("SW: invalid operation\n"); > #endif /* DEBUGGING */ Well, IMHO, the code was more readable and checkable in the initial version. I think this is one example of exceptions where code appearance is more important than style correctness. Regards, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/