On 7/31/24 12:13 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> Use of_property_present() and of_property_read_bool() to test
> property presence and read boolean properties rather than
> of_(find|get)_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove
> callers of of_find_property() and similar functions.
> of_(find|get)_property() leak the DT struct property and data pointers
> which is a problem for dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <r...@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.ji...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c | 2 +-
> drivers/nvmem/layouts.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> index 403384f25ce3..b4a1cf70e8b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int of_pmem_region_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> }
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
>
> - is_volatile = !!of_find_property(np, "volatile", NULL);
> + is_volatile = of_property_read_bool(np, "volatile");
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Registering %s regions from %pOF\n",
> is_volatile ? "volatile" : "non-volatile", np);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> index 77a4119efea8..65d39e19f6ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int nvmem_layout_bus_populate(struct nvmem_device
> *nvmem,
> int ret;
>
> /* Make sure it has a compatible property */
> - if (!of_get_property(layout_dn, "compatible", NULL)) {
> + if (!of_property_present(layout_dn, "compatible")) {
> pr_debug("%s() - skipping %pOF, no compatible prop\n",
> __func__, layout_dn);
> return 0;
