"Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am surprised that anyone is seriously considering denying
> service to sites that do not implement an _experimental_ facility
> and have firewalls that try to play things safe by dropping packets
> which have 1's in bit positions that in the RFC "must be zero."
I don't think people are seriously worried whether site implement ECN
right now.
But it would be much nicer to those that _want_ to implement it were
fascist firewalls to set those bits to zero, rather than sending RSTs
back or dripping the packet.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
Silver's law: If Murphy's law can go wrong it will.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
