Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 13:50 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Ian Campbell wrote:
I finessed the length issue slightly since it happens that the word
before the payload is the payload's length. I'm mulling a variety of
options:
      * declare it compression scheme dependant. At least for gzip
it
        knows when it has reached the end.
      * codify the length followed by data thing we happen to have
now
      * add a length field to the header, using another 4 bytes (is
        there any pressure on the size of the header?).

I'd probably go with the later unless we are pressed for space in
the
header.
I would agree with that. In fact, while we're adding fields to the header, I would like to add a field that would be the CRC32 (or other simple integrity check) over the whole image.

As in over the whole compressed payload part? I'll add that while I'm
there.


I was actually thinking about the whole bzImage.

Obviously, it can't cover itself (unless it's something like a plain checksum) so presumably it would compute it with its own field set to zero.

        -hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to