Recent change in how get_user() handles pointers [1] has a specific case
for LAM. It assigns a different bitmask that's later used to check
whether a pointer comes from userland in get_user().

While currently commented out (until LASS [2] is merged into the kernel)
it's worth making changes to the LAM selftest ahead of time.

Add test case to LAM that utilizes a ioctl (FIOASYNC) syscall which uses
get_user() in its implementation. Execute the syscall with differently
tagged pointers to verify that valid user pointers are passing through
and invalid kernel/non-canonical pointers are not.

Code was tested on a Sierra Forest Xeon machine that's LAM capable. The
test was ran without issues with both the LAM lines from [1] untouched
and commented out. The test was also ran without issues with LAM_SUP
both enabled and disabled.

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024013214.129639-1-torva...@linux-foundation.org/
[2] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240710160655.3402786-1-alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com/

Signed-off-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-ret...@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
index 0ea4f6813930..3c53d4b7aa61 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
 #include <time.h>
 #include <signal.h>
 #include <setjmp.h>
@@ -43,10 +44,19 @@
 #define FUNC_INHERITE           0x20
 #define FUNC_PASID              0x40
 
+/* get_user() pointer test cases */
+#define GET_USER_USER           0
+#define GET_USER_KERNEL_TOP     1
+#define GET_USER_KERNEL_BOT     2
+#define GET_USER_KERNEL         3
+
 #define TEST_MASK               0x7f
+#define L5_SIGN_EXT_MASK        (0xFFUL << 56)
+#define L4_SIGN_EXT_MASK        (0x1FFFFUL << 47)
 
 #define LOW_ADDR                (0x1UL << 30)
 #define HIGH_ADDR               (0x3UL << 48)
+#define L5_ADDR                 (0x1UL << 48)
 
 #define MALLOC_LEN              32
 
@@ -370,6 +380,54 @@ static int handle_syscall(struct testcases *test)
        return ret;
 }
 
+static int get_user_syscall(struct testcases *test)
+{
+       int ret = 0;
+       int ptr_value = 0;
+       void *ptr = &ptr_value;
+       int fd;
+
+       uint64_t bitmask = ((uint64_t)ptr & L5_ADDR) ? L5_SIGN_EXT_MASK :
+                                                      L4_SIGN_EXT_MASK;
+
+       if (test->lam != 0)
+               if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0)
+                       return 2;
+
+       fd = memfd_create("lam_ioctl", 0);
+       if (fd == -1)
+               exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+       switch (test->later) {
+       case GET_USER_USER:
+               /* Control group - properly tagger user pointer */
+               ptr = (void *)set_metadata((uint64_t)ptr, test->lam);
+               break;
+       case GET_USER_KERNEL_TOP:
+               /* Kernel address with top bit cleared */
+               bitmask &= (bitmask >> 1);
+               ptr = (void *)((uint64_t)ptr | bitmask);
+               break;
+       case GET_USER_KERNEL_BOT:
+               /* Kernel address with bottom sign-extension bit cleared */
+               bitmask &= (bitmask << 1);
+               ptr = (void *)((uint64_t)ptr | bitmask);
+               break;
+       case GET_USER_KERNEL:
+               /* Try to pass a kernel address */
+               ptr = (void *)((uint64_t)ptr | bitmask);
+               break;
+       default:
+               printf("Invalid test case value passed!\n");
+               break;
+       }
+
+       if (ioctl(fd, FIOASYNC, ptr) != 0)
+               ret = 1;
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
 int sys_uring_setup(unsigned int entries, struct io_uring_params *p)
 {
        return (int)syscall(__NR_io_uring_setup, entries, p);
@@ -883,6 +941,33 @@ static struct testcases syscall_cases[] = {
                .test_func = handle_syscall,
                .msg = "SYSCALL:[Negative] Disable LAM. Dereferencing pointer 
with metadata.\n",
        },
+       {
+               .later = GET_USER_USER,
+               .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
+               .test_func = get_user_syscall,
+               .msg = "GET_USER: get_user() and pass a properly tagged user 
pointer.\n",
+       },
+       {
+               .later = GET_USER_KERNEL_TOP,
+               .expected = 1,
+               .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
+               .test_func = get_user_syscall,
+               .msg = "GET_USER:[Negative] get_user() with a kernel pointer 
and the top bit cleared.\n",
+       },
+       {
+               .later = GET_USER_KERNEL_BOT,
+               .expected = 1,
+               .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
+               .test_func = get_user_syscall,
+               .msg = "GET_USER:[Negative] get_user() with a kernel pointer 
and the bottom sign-extension bit cleared.\n",
+       },
+       {
+               .later = GET_USER_KERNEL,
+               .expected = 1,
+               .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
+               .test_func = get_user_syscall,
+               .msg = "GET_USER:[Negative] get_user() and pass a kernel 
pointer.\n",
+       },
 };
 
 static struct testcases mmap_cases[] = {
-- 
2.46.2


Reply via email to