Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 10:17 PM Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:33:55 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org>
> wrote:
> > > This conflicts with "[PATCH] m68k: defconfig: Update defconfigs for
> > > v6.12-rc1"[1]. Of course the proper way forward would be to add
> > > "default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS" to all tests that still lack it, so I can
> > > just never queue that patch ;-)
> >
> > What's the status of this series? I am asking because I am wondering if
> > I should queue [1] for v6.13, or just drop it, and send a patch to add
> > "default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS" instead.
> >
> > I saw the email from Andrew stating he applied it to his tree[2],
> > but that seems to have been dropped silently, and never made it into
> > linux-next?
>
> Yes, sorry. Believe it or not, I do try to avoid spraying out too many
> emails. David will recall better than I, but things got messy.
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241009162719.0adae...@canb.auug.org.au was
> perhaps the cause.
Fair enough.
> I'm sure David can being us up to date.
Probably the best solution is to respin after v6.13-rc1, to be included
in v6.13-rc2.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
