James Sutherland writes: > I was not suggesting ignoring these. OTOH, there is no reason to treat an > RST packet as "go away and never ever send traffic to this host again" - > i.e. trying another TCP connection, this time with ECN disabled, would be > acceptable. The connection failed, RST means connection reset. RST means all state is corrupt and this connection must die. It cannot be interpreted in any other way. Using it as a metric for ECN enabling is thus unacceptable. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Marian Jancar
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dax Kelson
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allo... List User
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allo... Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Chris Ricker
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jeremy M. Dolan
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Drago Goricanec