Dax Kelson wrote: > Jamie Lokier said once upon a time (Fri, 26 Jan 2001): > > > Does ECN provide perceived benefits to the node using it? > > Why are you even making suggestions when you haven't even read the RFC? > > It seems that knowing what ECN is would be prerequisite to engaging in > discussion about it. I do know what ECN is thanks. Whether it provides _actual_ perceived benefits depends on how widely deployed ECN routers and servers are. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- ECN Simon Kirby
- Re: ECN Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Marian Jancar
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dax Kelson
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allow it? Jamie Lokier
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allow it? List User
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allow it? Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Chris Ricker