On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 05:52:20PM -0500, Ira Weiny wrote:
> A dynamic capacity device (DCD) sends events to signal the host for
> changes in the availability of Dynamic Capacity (DC) memory.  These
> events contain extents describing a DPA range and meta data for memory
> to be added or removed.  Events may be sent from the device at any time.
> 
...
> Tag support within the DAX layer is not yet supported.  To maintain
> compatibility with legacy DAX/region processing only tags with a value
> of 0 are allowed.  This defines existing DAX devices as having a 0 tag
> which makes the most logical sense as a default.
> 
> Process DCD events and create region devices.
> 
> Based on an original patch by Navneet Singh.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.ji...@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Li Ming <ming...@zohomail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
> 
Hi Ira,
I have some comments inline. 
There is one that will need to fix if I understand the code correctly.

> ---
> Changes:
> [iweiny: rebase]
> [djbw: s/region/partition/]
> [iweiny: Adapt to new partition arch]
> [iweiny: s/tag/uuid/ throughout the code]
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/Makefile |   2 +-
>  drivers/cxl/core/core.h   |  13 ++
>  drivers/cxl/core/extent.c | 366 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c   | 292 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c |   3 +
>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h         |  53 ++++++-
>  drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h      |  27 ++++
>  include/cxl/event.h       |  31 ++++
>  tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild  |   3 +-
>  9 files changed, 786 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
...  
> +static int send_one_response(struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox,
I feel like the name is not that informative, maybe 
send_one_dc_response?
> +                          struct cxl_mbox_dc_response *response,
> +                          int opcode, u32 extent_list_size, u8 flags)
> +{
> +     struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd) {
> +             .opcode = opcode,
> +             .size_in = struct_size(response, extent_list, extent_list_size),
> +             .payload_in = response,
> +     };
> +
> +     response->extent_list_size = cpu_to_le32(extent_list_size);
> +     response->flags = flags;
> +     return cxl_internal_send_cmd(cxl_mbox, &mbox_cmd);
> +}
> +
> +static int cxl_send_dc_response(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, int opcode,
> +                             struct xarray *extent_array, int cnt)
> +{
> +     struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox = &mds->cxlds.cxl_mbox;
> +     struct cxl_mbox_dc_response *p;
> +     struct cxl_extent *extent;
> +     unsigned long index;
> +     u32 pl_index;
> +
> +     size_t pl_size = struct_size(p, extent_list, cnt);
> +     u32 max_extents = cnt;
> +
> +     /* May have to use more bit on response. */
> +     if (pl_size > cxl_mbox->payload_size) {
> +             max_extents = (cxl_mbox->payload_size - sizeof(*p)) /
> +                           sizeof(struct updated_extent_list);
> +             pl_size = struct_size(p, extent_list, max_extents);
> +     }
> +
> +     struct cxl_mbox_dc_response *response __free(kfree) =
> +                                             kzalloc(pl_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!response)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     if (cnt == 0)
> +             return send_one_response(cxl_mbox, response, opcode, 0, 0);
> +
> +     pl_index = 0;
> +     xa_for_each(extent_array, index, extent) {
> +             response->extent_list[pl_index].dpa_start = extent->start_dpa;
> +             response->extent_list[pl_index].length = extent->length;
> +             pl_index++;
> +
> +             if (pl_index == max_extents) {
> +                     u8 flags = 0;
> +                     int rc;
> +
> +                     if (pl_index < cnt)
> +                             flags |= CXL_DCD_EVENT_MORE;
> +                     rc = send_one_response(cxl_mbox, response, opcode,
> +                                            pl_index, flags);
> +                     if (rc)
> +                             return rc;
> +                     cnt -= pl_index;
> +                     pl_index = 0;

The logic here seems incorrect. 
Let's say cnt = 8, and max_extents = 5.
For the first 5 extents, it works fine. But after the first 5 extents
are processed (response sent), the cnt will become 8-5=3, however,
max_extents is still 5, so there is no chance we can send response for
the last 3 extents.
I think we need to update max_extents based on "cnt" after each
iteration.

> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!pl_index) /* nothing more to do */
> +             return 0;
...
> +/*
> + * Add Dynamic Capacity Response
> + * CXL rev 3.1 section 8.2.9.9.9.3; Table 8-168 & Table 8-169
> + */
> +struct cxl_mbox_dc_response {
> +     __le32 extent_list_size;

As jonathan mentioned, "size" may be not a good name.
Maybe "nr_extents"?

Fan
> +     u8 flags;
> +     u8 reserved[3];
> +     struct updated_extent_list {
> +             __le64 dpa_start;
> +             __le64 length;
> +             u8 reserved[8];
> +     } __packed extent_list[];
> +} __packed;
> +
>  struct cxl_mbox_get_supported_logs {
>       __le16 entries;
>       u8 rsvd[6];
> @@ -644,6 +662,14 @@ struct cxl_mbox_identify {
>       UUID_INIT(0xfe927475, 0xdd59, 0x4339, 0xa5, 0x86, 0x79, 0xba, 0xb1, \
>                 0x13, 0xb7, 0x74)
>  
> +/*
> + * Dynamic Capacity Event Record
> + * CXL rev 3.1 section 8.2.9.2.1; Table 8-43
> + */
> +#define CXL_EVENT_DC_EVENT_UUID                                             \
> +     UUID_INIT(0xca95afa7, 0xf183, 0x4018, 0x8c, 0x2f, 0x95, 0x26, 0x8e, \
> +               0x10, 0x1a, 0x2a)
> +
>  /*
>   * Get Event Records output payload
>   * CXL rev 3.0 section 8.2.9.2.2; Table 8-50
> @@ -669,6 +695,7 @@ enum cxl_event_log_type {
>       CXL_EVENT_TYPE_WARN,
>       CXL_EVENT_TYPE_FAIL,
>       CXL_EVENT_TYPE_FATAL,
> +     CXL_EVENT_TYPE_DCD,
>       CXL_EVENT_TYPE_MAX
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/include/cxl/event.h b/include/cxl/event.h
> index f9ae1796da85..0c159eac4337 100644
> --- a/include/cxl/event.h
> +++ b/include/cxl/event.h
> @@ -108,11 +108,42 @@ struct cxl_event_mem_module {
>       u8 reserved[0x2a];
>  } __packed;
>  
> +/*
> + * CXL rev 3.1 section 8.2.9.2.1.6; Table 8-51
> + */
> +struct cxl_extent {
> +     __le64 start_dpa;
> +     __le64 length;
> +     u8 uuid[UUID_SIZE];
> +     __le16 shared_extn_seq;
> +     u8 reserved[0x6];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/*
> + * Dynamic Capacity Event Record
> + * CXL rev 3.1 section 8.2.9.2.1.6; Table 8-50
> + */
> +#define CXL_DCD_EVENT_MORE                   BIT(0)
> +struct cxl_event_dcd {
> +     struct cxl_event_record_hdr hdr;
> +     u8 event_type;
> +     u8 validity_flags;
> +     __le16 host_id;
> +     u8 partition_index;
> +     u8 flags;
> +     u8 reserved1[0x2];
> +     struct cxl_extent extent;
> +     u8 reserved2[0x18];
> +     __le32 num_avail_extents;
> +     __le32 num_avail_tags;
> +} __packed;
> +
>  union cxl_event {
>       struct cxl_event_generic generic;
>       struct cxl_event_gen_media gen_media;
>       struct cxl_event_dram dram;
>       struct cxl_event_mem_module mem_module;
> +     struct cxl_event_dcd dcd;
>       /* dram & gen_media event header */
>       struct cxl_event_media_hdr media_hdr;
>  } __packed;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild b/tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild
> index 387f3df8b988..916f2b30e2f3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild
> +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild
> @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ cxl_core-y += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/cdat.o
>  cxl_core-y += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/ras.o
>  cxl_core-y += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/acpi.o
>  cxl_core-$(CONFIG_TRACING) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/trace.o
> -cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_REGION) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/region.o
> +cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_REGION) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/region.o \
> +                              $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/extent.o
>  cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_MCE) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/mce.o
>  cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_FEATURES) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/features.o
>  cxl_core-y += config_check.o
> 
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

-- 
Fan Ni (From gmail)

Reply via email to