On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:02 AM David Gow <david...@google.com> wrote: > > Nice! While I do think there may still be some cases where we might > want to use KUnit-specific macros in the future (particularly if we > have more complex, multithreaded test contexts), this is definitely > better for most cases. > > I also managed to test it against the 1.88 nightly, and the message is > looking good. > > Reviewed-by: David Gow <david...@google.com>
Thanks for all the feedback and for testing it, David! Very much appreciated. Given you were happy with this first version already and that others want to use it soon, I did a few final minor tweaks and I am applying it. Cheers, Miguel
