On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 04:13:17PM +0530, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote:
> Add device awake calls in case of rproc boot and rproc shutdown path.
> Currently, device awake call is only present in the recovery path
> of remoteproc. If an user stops and starts rproc by using the sysfs
> interface, then on pm suspension the firmware fails to load as the
> request_firmware call under adsp_load relies on usermodehelper 
> process which gets freezed on pm suspension. Add device awake calls 
> to fix this.
> 

This is much better, but it still leaves me guessing what the actual
problem is. Does the firmware call time out? Does firmware loading
explicitly fail upon a freeze?

Also, please rephrase the commit message to follow the order defined in
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes 
i.e. start with the description of the problem, not the word "Add".

Regards,
Bjorn

> Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chowdhury <quic_schow...@quicinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.o...@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v5
> 
> *Added more details to commit description
> 
> Changes in v4
> 
> *Remove stability from mailing list
> *Remove the extra tab in v3
> *Change the commit description
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c 
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index c2cf0d277729..5d6c4e694b4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1917,6 +1917,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
>  
> +     pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
>       dev = &rproc->dev;
>  
>       ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
> @@ -1961,6 +1962,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
>               atomic_dec(&rproc->power);
>  unlock_mutex:
>       mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> +     pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
>       return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_boot);
> @@ -1991,6 +1993,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>       struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>       int ret = 0;
>  
> +     pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
>       ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
>       if (ret) {
>               dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
> @@ -2027,6 +2030,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>       rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
>  out:
>       mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> +     pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
>       return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Reply via email to