On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 08:11:01PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote: > + /* Need preemption disable for using shazptr. */ > + guard(preempt)(); > + > + /* Protect the list search with shazptr. */ > + guard(shazptr)(hash_head);
OK, this is the end of the series, and so far every single user is doing both a preempt and a shazptr guard. Why can't we simplify this and have the shazptr guard imply preempt-disable?
