Hello Boqun,

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 08:11:01PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Erik Lundgren and Breno Leitao reported [1] a case where
> lockdep_unregister_key() can be called from time critical code pathes
> where rntl_lock() may be held. And the synchronize_rcu() in it can slow
> down operations such as using tc to replace a qdisc in a network device.
> 
> In fact the synchronize_rcu() in lockdep_unregister_key() is to wait for
> all is_dynamic_key() callers to finish so that removing a key from the
> key hashlist, and we can use shazptr to protect the hashlist as well.
> 
> Compared to the proposed solution which replaces synchronize_rcu() with
> synchronize_rcu_expedited(), using shazptr here can achieve the
> same/better synchronization time without the need to send IPI. Hence use
> shazptr here.
> 
> Reported-by: Erik Lundgren <elundg...@meta.com>
> Reported-by: Breno Leitao <lei...@debian.org>
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250321-lockdep-v1-1-78b732d19...@debian.org/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.f...@gmail.com>

First of all, thanks for working to fix the origianl issue. I've been
able to test this in my host, and the gain is impressive.

Before:

         # time /usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root handle 0x1234: mq
         real    0m13.195s
         user    0m0.001s
         sys     0m2.746s
        
With your patch:

        #  time /usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root handle 0x1234: mq
        real    0m0.135s
        user    0m0.002s
        sys     0m0.116s

        #  time /usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root handle 0x1: mq
        real    0m0.127s
        user    0m0.001s
        sys     0m0.112s

Please add the following to the series:

Tested-by: Breno Leitao <lei...@debian.org>

Reply via email to