Hello Boqun, On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 08:11:01PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote: > Erik Lundgren and Breno Leitao reported [1] a case where > lockdep_unregister_key() can be called from time critical code pathes > where rntl_lock() may be held. And the synchronize_rcu() in it can slow > down operations such as using tc to replace a qdisc in a network device. > > In fact the synchronize_rcu() in lockdep_unregister_key() is to wait for > all is_dynamic_key() callers to finish so that removing a key from the > key hashlist, and we can use shazptr to protect the hashlist as well. > > Compared to the proposed solution which replaces synchronize_rcu() with > synchronize_rcu_expedited(), using shazptr here can achieve the > same/better synchronization time without the need to send IPI. Hence use > shazptr here. > > Reported-by: Erik Lundgren <elundg...@meta.com> > Reported-by: Breno Leitao <lei...@debian.org> > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250321-lockdep-v1-1-78b732d19...@debian.org/ [1] > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.f...@gmail.com>
First of all, thanks for working to fix the origianl issue. I've been able to test this in my host, and the gain is impressive. Before: # time /usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root handle 0x1234: mq real 0m13.195s user 0m0.001s sys 0m2.746s With your patch: # time /usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root handle 0x1234: mq real 0m0.135s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.116s # time /usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root handle 0x1: mq real 0m0.127s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.112s Please add the following to the series: Tested-by: Breno Leitao <lei...@debian.org>