On 26/06/2025 11:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: csi_clk_mux
No, I already provided arguments in two lengthy discussions - this is
not sorted by name.

Keep the same order as in previous device, so msm8916 for example. Or
any other, but listen to some requests to sort it by some arbitrary rule
which was never communicated by DT maintainers.

I don't think if you look through the history that you can find a consistent rule that was used to arrange the registers.

So we are trying to have a consistent way of doing that. Thats why the last number of additions have been sort by name, because it seemed to be the most consistent.

commit c830aff08d51f8391e59fc6744757c58e320b41b
Author: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.cze...@mainlining.org>
Date:   Sun Nov 3 10:45:35 2024 +0100

    media: dt-bindings: Add qcom,msm8953-camss

commit 2ab7f87a7f4bf392e3836a2600f115a1baa1415c
Author: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonog...@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri Mar 14 13:14:00 2025 +0000

    dt-bindings: media: Add qcom,x1e80100-camss

commit c35ad8e3c59714e9cef96036edad1529e70d1a7a
Author: Depeng Shao <quic_depe...@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon Jan 13 10:01:29 2025 +0530

    dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sm8550-camss binding

commit 0274ea59f83e4650c75b1a0370fbfa540bb88f9e
Author: Richard Acayan <mailingrad...@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 4 22:50:15 2025 -0500

    dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sdm670-camss

commit 5593555343f3ec299ca28d46a478e718c1119f74
Author: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikra...@quicinc.com>
Date:   Sat Dec 7 00:48:56 2024 +0530

    media: dt-bindings: Add qcom,sc7280-camss

---
bod

Reply via email to