Hi Krzysztof, On Tue Jul 1, 2025 at 10:12 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 08:55:42AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote: >> @@ -91,6 +93,7 @@ allOf: >> properties: >> compatible: >> enum: >> + - qcom,sm7635-mpss-pas >> - qcom,sm8350-mpss-pas >> - qcom,sm8450-mpss-pas >> then: >> @@ -142,6 +145,22 @@ allOf: >> - const: cx >> - const: mxc >> >> + - if: >> + properties: >> + compatible: >> + enum: >> + - qcom,sm7635-wpss-pas > > Everything fits better sm6350 and no need for new if:then: entry, at > least it looks like.
True, that seems to work fine as well. I can add it to the qcom,sm6350-pas.yaml bindings instead of sm8350 in the next version. To be honest, I don't quite understand what the concept behind the different PAS bindings are, when an SoC should get a new .yaml file, and when to add to an existing one. Regards Luca > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
