On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 01:38:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>On 21/07/2025 08:42, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> +
>>> +  interrupt-names:
>>> +    minItems: 6
>>> +    maxItems: 6
>> 
>> Ditto.
>> 
>> Do you need to define the list?
>
>
>Did you read the entire binding? It reminds me Frank's comment as well -

I DO.

>instead of actually checking you just ask question which you would find
>answer by yourselves if you really opened the code.

I see there is a list in pas-common with entries listed. So just wonder
here is there a need to list all 6 entries. Not qcom developer, just
go through the list and see what I could do.

Things could be improved if ask language is not welcomed. Or I am
doing something wrong here?

>
>> 
>>> +
>>> +  qcom,qmp:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>> +    description: Reference to the AOSS side-channel message RAM.
>>> +
>>> +  smd-edge: false
>>> +
>>> +  firmware-name:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
>>> +    minItems: 1
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - description: Firmware name of the Hexagon core
>>> +      - description: Firmware name of the Hexagon Devicetree
>>> +
>>> +  memory-region:
>>> +    minItems: 1
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - description: Memory region for core Firmware authentication
>>> +      - description: Memory region for Devicetree Firmware authentication
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +  - reg
>>> +  - memory-region
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>> +  - $ref: /schemas/remoteproc/qcom,pas-common.yaml#
>>> +  - if:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        compatible:
>>> +          enum:
>>> +            - qcom,milos-adsp-pas
>>> +            - qcom,milos-cdsp-pas
>>> +    then:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        memory-region:
>>> +          minItems: 2
>>> +          maxItems: 2
>>> +        firmware-name:
>>> +          minItems: 2
>>> +          maxItems: 2
>> 
>> Just keep minItems if maxItems is same value.
>
>
>This is not a correct advice.

Sorry for this. I may need to find out more in dt-schema.

Regards,
Peng

>
>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof

Reply via email to